.



For many hockey historians, the 1975 New Year’s Eve encounter between the star-studded Montreal Canadiens and the Soviet Central Red Army contingent was one of the best games ever played.

I’ve never really felt that way.

There is no question the Habs came out fired-up that night. It was unlike any run-of-the-mill regular-season game and different even from the normal intensity of an NHL playoff match-up.

This was billed as—and really was—a once-in-a lifetime meeting between two storied hockey franchises at their peak.

All this said, the Red Army didn’t show a lot that night, though they managed to tie the game 3-3. They came back from an early deficit against Montreal and goalie Ken Dryden (who struggled against Russian opponents throughout his career), scoring their goals on something like a total of 14 shots.

It was a fun game to watch, for sure. But to say it was the greatest of all time, I just don’t know. The stakes were certainly high, in terms of prestige and build-up. For me, though, to be the “best ever” would require two teams playing at their max, and that night, Montreal did, but the visitors didn’t. The Soviet side tied the game in the end because they were opportunistic, not because they played well. (I thought Tretiak was actually better in goal that night, though, than he had been throughout much of the 1972 Summit Series.)

A New Year’s game that I actually attended in person happened about 10 years previous in Detroit. I can’t honestly recall if it was in 1965 or 1966. (OK, to prove once again how memory can fail, I just looked it up, because I remember the score of the game that night, 1-1. The history book tells me that the game was actually played on December 31, 1964. I’ll have to change the title of this story!)

So with that bit of information, I was 11 at the time, and very excited to attend a game. It was still a rarity for me to go to games at the Olympia. That was the only NHL building I had ever been in, at that point I my life—and not often at that.

It was a bit of a departure that my Dad and I would attend the game on a New Year’s Eve. It was a tradition that we would always go to my Aunt Olive’s house for a big ‘family and friends’ celebration. But on this night, we went across the border and took in the Red Wing game first, and then Dad and I caught up with the rest of the family for the annual socializing.

We were “walk-ups” that night, though I don’t think people used that term in those days when describing folks who showed up for tickets at the last minute. On this particular night, we got there just as the game started. Other than the usual hometown Red Wing favorites—Howe, Delvecchio and Ullman—the big draws were Bobby Hull, Stan Mikita and a really strong Black Hawk team. What we didn’t know at the time was that these two teams were destined to meet in the semi-finals later that season in a great 7-game playoff series.

With two good teams on hand, we expected an exciting game. We couldn’t actually get seats, as the game was a sell-out. We did manage to get standing-room tickets. We were scrunched in together on the first level, behind one of the nets.

It turned out to be one of the more boring games I’ve ever been to. If you don’t have a rooting interest—and I didn’t that night—you hope to see a lot of goals. In fairness, I was pretty young, so I’m sure I missed a lot of the nuances of the game, especially when I could barely see any of the action from the ‘end-zone’ standing room section. But the game was dull, finished 1-1, and it was one of those nights (like the occasional night nowadays when Ovechkin just doesn’t do much) that Hull, usually the most exciting player in the game at the time, did precious little. It’s likely he was closely covered that night, and neither he nor Howe did anything out of the ordinary.

But it was still a thrill to be watching an NHL game, with some of the greatest players in the world on display. I was with my Dad and it was New Year’s Eve, so it was all good.

Wednesday, December 30, 2009

Vintage Leaf Memories is evolving

When I conceived Vintage Leaf Memories many months ago, I thought in terms of a site exclusively dedicated to my memories and stories about the Maple Leafs in the 1950s, ‘60s and ‘70s.

Because I was born in the early ‘50s, for me, the concept of what is a “vintage” memory falls into that late ‘50s through ‘70s time frame.

For some, “vintage” may be before that time period, for others, after.

Regardless, I’d enjoy hearing from those following this site about their own “Vintage Leaf” memories- for that matter, any great old hockey memories you have.

In the meantime, you may have noticed that, on occasion, I will post on subjects relating to the current-day Leafs. They’re a team in transition, but Leaf fans continue to hope that a championship contender is not that far off. The feedback I’ve received is that readers also enjoy some discussion on the present, and I’m happy to oblige as best I can.

The site is intended to be fun—a bit of history, some nostalgia, warm (or sometimes frustrating!) memories. I certainly don’t have the last word on all of the subjects I post on. Readers have sometimes reminded me of errors I’ve made, and I’m happy to acknowledge my memory can fail me.

We post comments on our site, and all we ask is that people write respectfully.

Everyone is welcome to send along their stories, whatever your definition of vintage! Contact us at Michael@prospectcommunications.com





Any baseball fan knows that Babe Ruth is perhaps the most legendary name in the history of that sport.

So, when Roger Maris made a run at Ruth’s single-season home run record of 60 back in 1961, the news media coverage was intense not only in New York city but throughout the United States, and even Canada. Maybe it wouldn’t seem like much compared with today, but for the time, the media focus was such that Maris experienced significant anxiety over the unwanted attention he was receiving.

Things were similarly intense when Hank Aaron (perhaps worse in Aaron’s case, as he received hate mail in the time leading up to his breaking the record) approached and eventually surpassed Ruth’s all-time home run record. Everyone knew the number to beat: 714. It was probably the most famous number in sport and still may be, though not only Aaron but also Barry Bonds have shattered Ruth’s mark.

When I was a youngster, in the hockey world, there were two numbers that really mattered, both established by the greatest pure goal-scorer on his generation: Rocket Richard.

Richard owned the single-season goal mark of 50, established during the 1940s. By the time he retired during training camp in the fall of 1960, he had accumulated a total of 544 regular-season career goals in his splendid, record-shattering career. (If I’m not mistaken, the big name he passed on the way to 544 was Nels Stewart, who had held the all-time record at 324 goals.)

Detroit Red Wing great Gordie Howe never managed to hit the 50-goal mark, though he did score 49 one season (and had another goal that should have been his awarded to a teammate, though he never complained about the error). Howe was, however, very much on Richard’s trail with regards to the all-time regular-season record when the Rocket retired.

At the outset of the 1963-’64 season, Howe was at 540 goals. It was big news where we lived, just across from Detroit. We had access to all the local Red Wing newspaper coverage and of course we listened to all their games on the radio. I so clearly remember following Howe’s exploits early that season. Not too far into the season he tied Richard’s mark with a goal against Montreal goaltender Gump Worsley at the Olympia in Detroit (the photo with this story shows Howe being checked by Montreal’s Gilles Tremblay as he nets the record-tying goal.  If you look closely you can also see the Rocket's brother, Henri Richard, standing at the bench gate.  Further along the bench I think it's captain Jean Beliveau also on his feet following the action). He needed just one more to break the record.


Now, Howe was never seemingly one to feel the pressure quite the way some athletes did. That said, he did seem to press after scoring number 544 and went dry for a couple of weeks. He had his chances (see the photo of Howe against Jacques Plante, the ex-Montreal great, with Vic Hadfield and Harry Howell in the background), but he was stuck on 544.

However, when arch-rival Montreal returned to play the Wings again, Howe excited the home crowd and set off a major celebration after he shot from the wing to beat Charlie Hodge (Hodge and Worsley shared goaltending duties that season for the Habs) and set the new NHL record of 545 career regular-season goals.

Howe didn’t stop there. He scored #600 against Worsley at the Forum in Montreal a couple of seasons later, then number 700 against the Penguins in Pittsburgh. (I believe it was during the 1968-’69 season, against Les Binkley. I remember watching the game on the Detroit UHF station, which showed Red Wing away games at the time in our area, but I could be wrong about who the goalie was.)

Of course, Wayne Gretzky shattered all the records in his remarkable career, surpassing Bobby Hull, Phil Esposito and Howe on the way to 894 regular-season NHL goals.

Interestingly, if you combine their NHL and WHA regular-season goal scoring totals, Hull finished with 913 goals (610 in the NHL), Gretzky with 940 and Howe with 974 (801 in the NHL).

While Howe’s total is not officially recognized by the NHL, I still think of him as the all-time record-holder- and I’ll always recall listening to the game on the radio the night he broke the Rocket’s record in the fall of 1963.





At the beginning of the 1973-’74 season, the Leafs had just come off a horrible year. They had missed the playoffs the previous spring after losing a number of outstanding young players—including star goalkeeper Bernie Parent—to the new World Hockey Association.

At training camp in 1973, they welcomed first-round draft choices Lanny McDonald, Bob Neely and Ian Turnbull. They also brought on board two young but largely unknown Swedish players: Borje Salming and Inge Hammarstrom.

By making—and staying with—the Leafs, Salming and Hammarstrom broke a barrier of sorts—Swedes playing successfully in the perceived-to-be more rugged NHL. Hammarstrom, a forward, was a wonderful skater with obvious skill and creativity. As older Leaf fans know, Salming went on to face down the bully tactics of the Philadelphia Flyers and over the years became a legend with the Leafs and eventually a Hall-of-Famer.

In the ‘70s, critics weren’t always as kind to Hammarstrom, who was not a prototypical “rugged Canadian”. His was a thinking, finesse game, but this was the era of the Broad Street Bullies and guys like Inge were often unfairly targeted. (His own boss, Leaf owner Harold Ballard, complained that Hammarstrom played too soft, but that is a story for another day.) Hammarstrom, who finished his NHL career with the St. Louis Blues, was good enough to represent Sweden in both the Olympics and the Canada Cup.

The facts remain that both Salming and Hammarstrom did something virtually unheard of at the time—and were successful.

But if I’m not mistaken, another Swedish player made the trek across the ocean many years before as the original European pioneer.

His name stands out to this day—Ulf Sterner. When I was a youngster, I remember hearing about a young Swede coming to the New York Rangers for the 1964-’65 season. The event certainly didn’t receive the kind of attention it would nowadays, but as a young hockey fan at the time I was aware of his arrival.

I just now checked to see how long Sterner’s NHL “career” lasted- and it wasn’t long at all.

After an impressive performance at the 1964 Winter Olympics, Sterner signed with New York and then played a total of 4 games in the NHL as a 23 year-old in that 1964-’65 season. While he didn’t put up points with the Rangers, he had big-time minor league numbers in that same season—30 goals and 35 assists in only 68 games between the Central Hockey League and the American Hockey league, the top minor leagues at the time.

Obviously he had talent, but for reasons I can’t recall, returned to Europe after that season to continue playing. He had an outstanding career back home before and after his short-lived North American stay, twice representing Sweden in the Olympics—once as an eighteen year-old.

Though he was drafted by the New York franchise in the WHA draft in 1972, he never came back to play in North America professionally.


Almost 10 years after Sterner made his NHL debut, Salming and Hammarstrom triggered a huge influx of European stars to North America, including Winnipeg Jets (and later New York Ranger) stars Anders Hedberg and Ulf Nilsson. Both Swedes played on a line in Winnipeg with former Black Hawk superstar Bobby Hull, and had many outstanding WHA seasons before jumping to the Rangers to finish off their careers in the NHL.

We all know that NHL rosters for years have been filled with players of European descent, but the European hockey invasion really started, it seems, with the little-talked-about Ulf Sterner.

Our readers may remember other players from Europe who came over before Sterner, and if so, send along your recollections!



This past week Vintage Leaf Memories ventured back in time to post on the one Leaf in history named “Noel”- defenseman Noel Price, who played with the blue and white in the late 1950s in the midst of a 20-year professional career.


We wrapped up the week with a question: From the days of Stan Weir to Matt Stajan on the present-day roster, why do the Leafs keep handing out Dave Keon’s number 14 jersey?

If you haven’t checked out these stories, take a moment to have a look.

Another fun week - thanks as always for your comments and feedback.

You can contact us at Michael@prospectcommunications.com





A perhaps unexpected win at the home rink of the defending Stanley Cup champions changed the entire complexion of the weekend. A workmanlike effort Saturday night against the Habs at home (albeit after yet another slow start) could have earned a better outcome than another OT loss. But two points on Sunday night means it was a strong weekend—for the team and in terms of the Eastern Conference standings.

The team’s refusal to cave is a testament to their resolve to stay the course, regardless of the personnel challenges coach Ron Wilson faces.

As I’ve said in previous posts, every guy on this squad is a legitimate NHL player. The difficulty is in working with a roster that simply doesn’t have a lot of top-tier offensive talent. But they are making do with a strong work ethic.

All this said, I’m one of those observers wondering who, on this current roster, will be playing for the Leafs say, three seasons from now?

I believe some of the back-end people will still be here. Burke is committed to Gustavsson in goal—he’s a Burke signing, as are Beauchemin and Komisarek on defense. I can see Ian White being on hand, though who knows what will happen as his stock rises throughout the league and free agency ultimately beckons. (I think Burke may try to sign him long-term before White hits free agency.)

Gunnarsson hasn’t had an opportunity to show what he can do, but he could be in the mix. Schenn I don’t know about. Like Gunnarsson, he wasn’t drafted by Burke and while he obviously shows signs of being a fine player, I wonder if he is the kind of piece Burke would surrender to bring in some high-end offense.

And Kaberle? Who has been talked about as trade-bait in recent years more than the longest-tenured Leaf defenseman? My thought is he, too, will be moved to bring in some offense, though wouldn’t it be ironic if Kaberle stays forever a Leaf despite the persistent talk to the contrary?

Up front, Kessel should and will be here. We all understand this was a major acquisition for Burke, giving up two top draft picks. (It’s hard to argue against that move, given that, at 22, Kessel is already a productive NHL player with star potential. Draft choices may turn out great, but then again, maybe not.) The question will be whether Kessel becomes a complete player, or just a nice player with offensive skills who ends up butting heads with his coaches.

But otherwise up front, who will be here in three years? Even in two years?

I go through the forward lines and I don’t see many who will still be around. Mayers, Orr, Primeau? All are players who can play a useful role, but are the types of players that, in a salary-cap age, can be easily replaced year-to-year.

Blake? Not likely, though he has certainly contributed. But age and contract status make it unlikely. Mitchell? Probably not. Ponikarovsky? I just can’t see him being a guy that plays his entire career with the Leafs, especially as Burke tries to change the mix on the team.

Matt Stajan? I know he’s a fan favorite of many, but I wonder if he has the offensive finishing on the one hand, or the toughness Burke likes on the other, to last under Burke long-term.

Kulemin? He’s a young guy who may be one of their better all-around performers of late. I certainly like what I’m seeing most nights. I have to believe he stays. Stalberg? He’s young, too, but I don’t know.

Stempniak often shows the grit Fletcher brought him in to deliver, but if Burke has other options down the road, I can see someone else in his role.

Grabovski? I could be very wrong, but I just don’t see him being here when Burke has the kind of team he wants. If you’re going to be a purely offensive guy, you have to figure that a guy better produce 70 points a season consistently, minimum.

Hanson, Bozak and Kadri are the “young guns” that are in line to excite Leaf fans in the future. That said, having seen so many young players with “potential” come and go through the Leaf system over the years, I tend to be from Missouri on such things: in other words, I’ll believe it when I actually see players deliver on a regular basis for the blue and white.

Not surprisingly, I guess, the Leaf team that takes the ice in 2011-2012 will likely be very different from what it is right now.

Thanks to a reader who pointed out a mistake on my part. Ronnie Ellis, who started his career in 1964-’65 with the Leafs wearing number 11, then switched to number 8, accepted the number 6 because of a request from another former Leaf ,“Ace” Bailey, not Syl Apps.


Bailey’s career was ended many years before after a hit from Bruins defenseman Eddie Shore. Bailey liked Ellis' style of play and insisted that he take Bailey’s old number 6.  As I was writing the story I was thinking it was Apps who made the offer, but it was in fact Bailey.

As I've mentioned before, my memory is not always accurate- thanks for catching my error!


We all know the Leafs don’t “retire” numbers. They should, and when I contemplate why, I think—not surprisingly—about Dave Keon.

Organizations reveal a lot about themselves from the ‘top’. The type of ownership that a team has can impact the way a team performs. If ownership is a joke, it’s sometimes hard for management to build the right kind of team and for the players to fight through all the silliness. (The Oakland Raiders in the NFL may be an example of that in recent years, though Al Davis—while always a maverick—was widely respected for many, many years.)

In the summer of 1975, Maple Leaf owner Harold Ballard showed his disrespect for the institution he, albeit in a small way, himself had helped to build.

Ballard had been involved with the Leaf organization dating back to the early 1950s’, I believe. He was involved in helping to build some successful junior teams in the Maple Leaf system, and eventually became a part-owner of the Leafs with John Bassett Sr. and Conn Smythe’s son, Stafford, in the early 1960s.

When Stafford died (around 1970, I believe it was) Ballard worked things such that he gained control of the Gardens—and the team.

While the guy obviously had his good side and loved hockey and wanted the Leafs to win, he also had a huge ego and liked publicity even more than winning, it seemed.


For reasons I don’t fully understand (I’m sure the various books written about the Leafs over the years can shed more light on this than I can) Ballard was a cantankerous guy. He and Keon were not close.

By all accounts, in the summer of ’75 Ballard simply refused to offer Keon a contract that reflected the Leaf captain’s 15 years with the organization—most as its best all-around player and a key figure in the team’s four Stanley Cup championships in the 1960s.

This came on the heels of Ballard’s stinging public criticism of Keon as a poor leader and captain the previous season.

So, without NHL options despite a brilliant career to that point (free agency didn’t exist), Keon fled the organization for the World Hockey Association and the Minnesota Fighting Saints. He eventually ended up with the New England/Hartford Whalers where he finished his career.

Arguably Keon was already on the downslide of a marvelous career when Ballard cast him adrift. Even as a big Keon fan I could see it myself. But as recently as the 1972-’73 season Keon had been, in my view, the best Leaf player by far. He wasn’t quite as effective in his last two seasons with the club, but he still a “plus” player (taking into account his plus-minus statistics) and could still play—as demonstrated by the fact that he proceeded to play another 7 years in the WHA and then back in the NHL with Hartford.

But in classic Ballard fashion, the team owner swept away the past, and before Leaf fans knew it, the number 14, worn proudly and with honor by Keon since the 1960-’61 season, belonged to former California Seal forward Stan Weir.

Now, Weir was a perfectly nice player. He had some good moments with the Leafs in the latter 1970s. But you had to wonder why were the Leafs so quick to give Keon’s number to another player, and not even someone with a deep history in the Leaf organization?

It obviously was a statement by Ballard, a mean-spirited one at that.

Many of you may recall that long-time Leaf great Syl Apps wanted Ronnie Ellis to wear his famous number 6 back in the late ‘60s. Ellis accepted because it was an honor—the offer coming straight from a former Leaf legend. That made sense and was a classy thing to do. Apps liked the way Ellis played. However Apps had retired as a Leaf and by all accounts had been treated respectfully by then owner Conn Smythe.

But this matter of right away handing out number 14 to a new Leaf was just another slap to Keon. Amazingly, Ballard, years later, asked for so much for Keon’s rights when the Islanders wanted Keon in a trade that Dave missed returning to a good NHL team when he still had some juice left.

Can anyone imagine Henri Richard retiring in Montreal, and then the very next season, his number being worn by a player who had just joined the team from, say, the Cleveland Barons?

This is not a criticism of the individuals who have worn the number 14 over the years, including Weir. In fact, current Leaf Matt Stajan wears number 14 has often said Keon was his dad’s favorite player, and that it is an honor for him to wear Keon’s old number.

If anyone doubts whether Keon was to Toronto what Richard was to the Leafs, (maybe more, as there was no Jean Beliveau “equivalent” in Toronto in that era) ask legendary Montreal writer Red Fisher. He saw Keon play against the Habs throughout the 60s, including in the playoffs five years in a row between 1963 and 1967. I interviewed Mr. Fisher recently, and you can listen to that interview and his comments about Keon by clicking on this link…

The current Leaf regime at least “honors” certain numbers. Ballard didn’t even do that. But despite overtures made to Keon over the years—and Dave did return for the 1967 team reunion a couple of years back—in my mind the organization is still a long way from undoing the damage done by the classless way Keon was treated more than 30 years ago.

They could start by not handing out number 14 to anyone in the future.

We’ve seen this movie before this season: Leafs fall behind, fight back, lose in overtime.

What is the stat—10 overtime games with one win? One “extra” point of the available 10—that’s a lot of lost points, which will obviously be painful come the end of the regular season.

Hard not to like Kulemin’s work on the first goal, or Blake going to the net for the second. (It was good earlier in the week to see the Leafs scoring twice that way at home—both times by going hard to the net.)

Kesell is in the midst of one of those temporary periods where a split second or a couple of inches means the difference between a goal and a miss. Confidence, fatigue both come into play. But he showed in the dying seconds of regulation time one of the reasons he is so dangerous—finding and quickly moving to open space. He could have won it right there.

One concerning thing, and this is nothing new: ten seasons into Tomas Kaberle’s often impressive career in Toronto, he continues to do things that make me cringe. On the overtime goal, was that really his best effort at trying to stop the Montreal forward who scored? (A week ago I watched Staios in Edmonton hobble around and block three shots in a row while helping the Oilers kill a 5-on-3 when the game was tied in the third period against Ovechkin and the Capitals.)

If Kaberle was still tired from his shift late in regulation time, then he shouldn’t have been on the ice. That’s on the coach. But a team that’s supposedly desperately fighting for a playoff spot needs more than that in its own zone when the game is on the line.

The 1970s were not particularly kind to the Maple Leafs, though as we have discussed on this site, they had some decent teams, making the playoffs in 1971 and ’72, and between 1974 and 1979.

But the ‘70s were particularly unkind to the Detroit Red Wings. They made the playoffs in 1969-’70 but lost in four straight. Despite drafting junior superstar Marcel Dionne in 1971, the team floundered until former Wing great Ted Lindsay took over as GM in the latter part of the decade. Even then, the team had no major success.


By contrast, the Montreal Canadiens, a powerhouse in the ‘50s and ‘60s, continued their generally stellar play. They won Cups in 1971, 1973 and every year between 1976 and 1979. It was a good time to be a Hab fan—which I wasn’t.

This brings to mind an experience I had during Christmas season many years ago, when I was home in the Essex County area on break from my university “studies”. My friend John and I were hanging out that day at my house, and in those days there was not a lot going right after Christmas. We decided at the last minute that we would cross the border and take in a Red Wing game scheduled for that afternoon.

This was probably late December of 1975. I’m going to say it was Boxing Day (the day after Christmas in Canada) but I only remember that it was shortly after Christmas day. The Wings were hosting the New York Islanders, the expansion team in the midst of becoming a contender. They had guys like Denis Potvin and Bill Harris (a different Billy Harris than had played with the Leafs in the ‘50s and ‘60s. This one was part of the well-known Shutt-Gardner-Harris line in junior hockey with the Toronto Marlies.) Both Potvin and Harris were first overall draft choices, and the team was getting better and was fun to watch.

The weather was really bad—a fair bit of snow had fallen—but we drove across to Detroit anyway. It was always fun to take in a game, so we were looking forward to it, though the Wings weren’t a good team at the time.

Well, lo and behold, we get to the Olympia, and there are people milling all around the lobby, looking agitated. We discover that the Red Wings had called off the game, because the players supposedly had a hard time getting to the rink.


Now, my friend and I had driven across the Canadian-U.S. border to get there, and we made it with no real problems. But reports the next day said Red Wing forward Mickey Redmond couldn’t get out of his drive way because of the snow. (Likely his phone wasn’t working to call a cab, either.)

My friend and I were ticked, obviously, as were all the people already at the Olympia ready for a hockey game. We wanted to see a game, as did all the other folks who had tickets already.

There was nothing we could all do but turn around and head home.

Now, around the same time (though I can’t swear about the time and date, or to be honest, even the exact year!) a big snowstorm hit Quebec. We’re talking almost 35 years ago so I may indeed have my years mixed up, but….I remember reading that Yvan Cournoyer of the Canadiens had taken his snowmobile to get to the Forum in Montreal so he wouldn’t miss a scheduled game—despite the horrible weather conditions and the fact that many fans could not make it to the game themselves..

In fairness, I didn’t and don’t know all the details surrounding the decision to cancel the Wings’ game in Detroit that snowy day. I was just a young hockey fan back then, on Christmas break, wanting to see a game. Redmond was a fine offensive player (a former Hab, in fact) who saw his career end prematurely because of a bad back. But cancelling a game because the players couldn’t get there? C’mon. Cournoyer took a snowmobile to get to the Forum so he could play, and the Wings couldn’t get out of their driveways?

It wasn’t exactly a life epiphany, but in that moment, it became clear to me why, in those years, the Habs were champions, and the Red Wings were perennial also-rans.

I only remember two NHL players with the first name “Noel”, which is the French word for “Christmas”.

The first was a one-time Maple Leaf- Noel Price.

I have little clear memory of Price’s time with the Leafs. I just now looked into his background, and there’s good reason my memory is thin: I was born in 1953 and Price played only a total of 29 games with the Leafs in the late 1950s, though he did play a bit in the playoffs in the spring of ’59.

With a French background myself (though not from Quebec), I would have thought anyone named anyone named “Noel” was probably born in La Belle Provence.

But in fact, Price was born in Ontario, and came up in the Leafs system. While he forged a 20-year pro career, he was a bit of a hockey vagabond. After the Leafs, he spent time with the Rangers and Red Wings, as well as the Canadiens. He spent most of his time in the AHL, but finally earned a full-time gig with the expansion Penguins in the late ‘60s and the Kings in the early ‘70s. He also spent three years in Atlanta with the pre-Calgary Flames, and finished his productive professional career in Nova Scotia.

Never flashy or a star, he managed to earn his keep for those 20 years, playing 500 NHL games and tons more in the minors.

The other “Noel” never played for the Leafs. I’m thinking of Noel Picard, who was indeed born in Quebec and came up in the Montreal system. He played ever so briefly with Montreal during the 1964-’65 season, and should have his name on the Stanley Cup, as he earned an assist in three playoff games that spring as Montreal won yet another championship.

Picard went on to be a rugged, stay-at-home defenseman for the St. Louis Blues for five seasons, a part of three St. Louis teams under the now legendary Scotty Bowman who went to the finals—twice losing to Picard’s original club, the Canadiens. Picard finished his career with the Flames in 1972-73, meaning that he and Price actually overlapped briefly with the same team.

Surely, they were the only two players named “Noel” on the same team at the same time in professional hockey history!

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Site re-design update

My apologies to those regular readers who are visiting the site this week. As I mentioned in an earlier post, we are in the midst of a new re-design, and are experiencing some difficulties in the change-over.

We had hoped to have the re-design properly implemented by Christmas, but it appears as though it may take a bit longer.

In the meantime, we are not quite the ‘old look’ and not quite the ‘new look’ just yet!

We ask for your patience. I will continue to post new articles and hopefully this will be cleared up as soon as possible.

The current Leaf team seems to have a lot of heart. Every guy is a bona-fide NHL player. The reality may be that they don’t have enough so-called ‘high-end’ guys, but they give an honest effort most nights.

That said, there’s nothing wrong with dreaming a bit at this time of year—and especially given the constraining reality of a salary-cap NHL world.

So, I’ve developed some stocking-stuffer wishes—if not for Burke, Wilson and company, then at least for fans—as the organization keeps building what Leaf supporters hope will be a true contender in the foreseeable future. For this particular list, what is “old” would look good as something new- in today’s blue and white.

These types of acquisitions can’t happen overnight, but trades, draft choices, free-agent signings—or some help from Santa—are all acceptable:

So, here are some Christmas wishes for the current Leaf team:


 a center who skates, forechecks and kills penalties like Dave Keon

 a winger who scores big goals like Dickie Duff

 a steady hands-on-the wheel leader like George Armstrong

 a great goalie who can play forever, like Johnny Bower

 another winger (Kessel is one) who can fly down the wing and create chances like Frank Mahovlich

 someone who can stir things up and still score goals, like Eddie Shack, or even a young Darcy Tucker

 a classic stay-at-home defenseman who fans can feel relaxed about when he’s on the ice, like Allan Stanley

 a fellow defenseman who can rush the puck and shoot like Tim Horton or Al Iafrate

 a tough grinder like crusty Bert Olmstead

 someone who can deliver punishing hits and finish, too, like Wendell Clark

 a player than can create those memorable nights, like Darryl Sittler

 a forward who can deliver old-fashioned, crunching, open-ice checks like Lanny McDonald

 a classy captain like Mats Sundin

 a couple of guys that other teams really don’t want to tangle with, like Kurt Walker and Tie Domi

 a true professional who was proud to wear the Leaf uniform, like Ronnie Ellis

 an energy player who runs around (coaches hate it but fans love it) and causes havoc in the other team’s zone, like Rocky Saganiuk

 a defenseman who is a virtuoso on skates like Borje Salming

 a nimble defender like Carl Brewer

 a defenseman who is tough as nails like Bobby Baun

 versatile guys like Al Arbour, Billy Harris and Dave Reid

 a pure goal-scorer, like Rick Vaive, who can also take punishment in front of the other team’s net

 a player who can overcome early career adversity and criticism to become a solid Leaf, like Todd Gill

 a late-round draft choice that plays well for the Leafs for a decade, like Tomas Kaberle

 an entertainer who could also play, like Tiger Williams


Not possible? That’s OK.

This is partly what Christmas is about. Believing in something without knowing for sure it will come true, but knowing in your heart there is indeed something worth believing in.

I guess that’s kind of the definition of faith. Leaf fans are nothing if not remarkably faithful.

In hockey terms, Leaf fans can still believe, and have for years, that something better is just around the corner.

If you have your own wish list, send it along.

Merry Christmas to everyone following our site!



Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Site re-design!

As Vintage Leaf Memories continues to grow and attract more and more followers, we have been looking to enhance the look of the site.

We just wanted to give a heads-up that we are doing a bit of a “re-design".

We’ve received some feedback from readers that they would like a design that’s a bit easier to read, and we’ve tried to accommodate that. Our “new look” should be in place soon.

Keep reading!


Hockey fans all know that Martin Brodeur has now broken Hall-of-Famer Terry Sawchuk’s longstanding NHL record of 103 regular-season shutouts. What Brodeur has done in this day and age of 32 teams and constant air travel is amazing, though what Sawchuk accomplished against the best players available in the world in his era was no less significant.

I certainly won’t try to compare the two men or give an opinion as to who was/is “better”; many other sites and posts have done just that quite capably.

What I’m remembering about Sawchuk right now is the night he earned his 100th career regular-season shutout against the powerful Chicago Black Hawks at the old Maple Leaf Gardens in March of 1967.

The game is shown fairly regularly on Leafs TV. If you haven’t seen it, you might enjoy it. The game itself was a rather ordinary affair in terms of excitement. The Leafs were trying to push their way up in the standings, the Hawks looking to solidify their hold on first place heading into the playoffs—which were just around the corner.

The Leafs won that night, and Sawhuck earned the milestone shutout against Hull, Mikita and a great Black Hawk team that did go on to finish first that season.

But the thing that stands out was the interview Sawchuk did with Ward Cornell (the Ron Maclean of his day) right after the game.

What’s interesting is that Sawchuk had a reputation as a cantankerous, edgy guy. But on this night, right after he posted a ‘number’ many thought would never be surpassed, he was so sincere, so grateful in speaking with Cornell. He was, at the time, a man of 37, a grizzled veteran, but so clearly appreciative of the moment. He thanked a number of teammates by name, and beneath his calm, soft-spoken manner you could feel his excitement.

I found it quite touching.

Sawchuk only netted three more regular-season shutouts in his career, though I believe he earned another one in the playoffs with the LA Kings the next season. He finished with 103 regular-season goose-eggs, and 12 more (including a stunning four shutouts in the 1951-’52 playoffs alone) in his playoff career. He finished his NHL career with 5 Stanley Cups.

Sadly, Sawchuk died just a few years later, apparently after suffering injuries in an off-ice incident involving a teammate.

Sawchuk played in an era with fewer teams and far fewer players. It was a slower game, with only a relatively small number of guys who had the kind of shooting power we see from almost everyone nowadays. But for his time, he was something special. He played injured. He played against the best players of his era. And when the Leafs needed him against the best team in the world in the spring of 1967, the Montreal Canadiens—despite two rough games earlier in the series—Sawchuk was outstanding in Games five and six.

If not for Sawchuk (and Johnny Bower, too, earlier in the series), Leaf fans would be saying “45 years and counting…”, instead of 42.

Brodeur deserves the accolades he is receiving now. He has authored a wonderful career. While Sawchuk’s name has been pushed down in the record-books, anyone who ever saw him play—and I was one of them—knows he was one of the finest goalies of all-time.




In my post earlier today on the playoff series between the Leafs and the Flyers in 1977, I was mistaken in writing that Roger Neilson was the Leaf coach that season.

Of course it was still Red Kelly, who the year before had the Leafs (or at least the media and the fans) almost believing in “Pyramid Power”, which is a story for another day. That year, the underdog Leafs made it to Game 7 against the then two-time defending Stanley Cup Champion Flyers, but lost.

As I wrote today, they also lost in the spring of 1977 and Kelly was replaced a while after that series. The Leafs then brought in a young, creative coach, Roger Neilson, who had a great track record as a Junior A coach, and spent a year in the Maple Leaf minor-league system coaching Dallas in the old Central Hockey League.

Neilson was one of the first to rely heavily on video analysis of games to assess his own players’ performance, as well as prepare for opponents. In his first year behind the bench in April, 1978, Neilson led the Leafs to that stunning playoff upset of the New York Islanders.


In the spring of 1977, the Leafs were a team with some pretty solid pieces—Darryl Sittler, Lanny McDonald and Tiger Williams (or Errol Thompson) were a good line; Borje Salming and Ian Turnbull played a lot of minutes on the blue line, and newcomer Kurt Warner gave them some additional toughness up front.

Importantly, young Mike Palmateer staked his claim to the number one job in goal, and gave the Leafs confidence that they had someone in net who could bail them out when needed.

They had a young, innovative coach in Roger Neilson, who prepared the team thoroughly for every opponent.

They needed all that—and more—when they were about to face the tough Philadelphia Flyers for the third consecutive year in the NHL playoffs.

The Flyers had won the Cup in 1974 and 1975 with a combination of talent, a tight-checking system under Fred Shero—and an intimidating style.

In 1976, the Canadiens ended the Flyer dominance, sweeping Philadelphia in 4 games in the finals. But no one had played more playoff hockey in the previous 3 years than the Flyers, they were still a top team and they were heavily favored to beat Toronto.

When the Leafs walked out of the old Philadelphia Spectrum with two road wins to start the series, Toronto fans were almost afraid to believe what might be possible.

After years of frustration, there was already a sense in Leafland that something could go wrong.

Moments after Game 2 ended, Leaf forward Tiger Williams was interviewed on the Hockey Night in Canada broadcast. He uttered what would become famous words when he was asked if he thought the Flyers could come back. No, he said, because “they’re done like dinner”.

Now, I shuddered when I heard that, not because I didn’t want to believe it, but because I’d always been wary of players saying anything that could be bulletin board material for the opposition.

It was great that the Leafs—at least Tiger—were/was so confident.

But I wondered if it wasn’t a bit premature to call an end to the series.

Game 3 was back in Toronto. As I was working in radio at the time just outside of Toronto, I was often in the press box that season, following the Leafs.


I remember being in the Gardens’ press box that night. The Leafs jumped out to a 2-0 lead, and for all the world looked like a team that could indeed take out the mighty Flyers, Bobby Clarke and all.

I recall being in the media room between the first and second period. Hockey Night host Dave Hodge was interviewing Flyer forward Bill Barber, and Barber looked absolutely stunned at what was going on. The Flyers still had Bernie Parent, Rick MacLeish and toughness (Schultz, Saleski, et al) up and down the line up.

I was convinced, after seeing Barber, that the Leafs were in command. They were in the Flyers’ heads. (As a media guy I was theoretically neutral, but I couldn’t throw almost 20 years of being a Leaf fan out the window, especially against the bully Flyers, who had moved up my ‘hate list’ just behind Montreal and Boston)

In the second period, the Leafs continued to dominate, but couldn’t get that third goal. The Flyers got one and the Leafs—you could just feel it—were suddenly under pressure.

It was 2-2 part-way through the third period, and the Leafs were reeling. But Errol Thompson scored on a turnaround backhand from the slot and the Leafs regained the lead at 3-2.


Then, in the dying seconds, the Flyers, with the extra attacker, buzzed around the Leaf net. I may be confusing events with what occurred in Game 4 two nights later, but I seem to recall Borje Salming trying to clear the puck out of the Toronto zone on a backhand. It was knocked down at the blue line—and ended up in the Leaf net. The Flyers then won it in overtime.

The Leafs fought hard again in Game 4, and had a 5-4 lead once again in the dying seconds. Again they couldn’t clear the puck and Bobby Clarke and the Flyers tied the score. (Clarke, in those days, may have been the most dangerous guy in hockey late in games. He was so driven, so determined, and would score or set up key goals time and again.)

I knew right then the Leafs were done—like dinner.

The Flyers won in overtime again, and went on to win the series in 6 games.

I’ve always felt that if the Leafs had just managed to get that third goal when it was 2-0 in Game 3, they would have won the series. The Flyers were primed to be beaten. But when the Flyers saw the opportunity, they responded and the Leafs just couldn’t quite close the deal.

The Leafs could not have handled Montreal that season in a playoff series anyway, but beating the Flyers would have been something to remember.

Tonight the Leafs host the Sabres. The win over the Bruins Saturday night once again brings hope. But hope is something that Leaf fans have felt countless times since the last championship season more than 40 years ago.

Those of you familiar with the long-running Peanuts comic know one of the occasional story lines has to do with Charlie Brown, a football, and his long-time childhood nemesis, Lucy.

How many times over the years has Lucy lured Charlie into believing she really will hold the ball long enough for him to ‘practice’ his place-kicking ability?

Every time he wonders, ponders—then relents. He trusts that things will be different this time and she will hold the ball in place so he can finally make a kick.

The end is always the same. Charlie ends up flat on his back after Lucy yet again pulls the football away at the last second.

Still, he keeps believing—and hoping the next time will be different.

Leaf fans will identify with this scenario, repeated time and again through the last 42 years and counting.

In short, since 1967, the Leafs have teased us mercilessly.

Let’s look back: After winning the Cup in ’67, surely, we thought, they would be competitive in 1967-’68, especially against all those ‘lousy’ expansion teams.

The team finished out of the playoffs.

In 1970-’71, the Leafs had me thinking they could beat the Rangers in the playoffs, after taking a 2-1 lead in the quarter-final series. They then fell flat and lost in 6 games.

The next season they were building a solid young team with future Hall-of-Famer Bernie Parent in goal and a number of potentially outstanding young defensemen in the line-up.

They all walked to the WHA, when owner Leaf Harold Ballard refused to “pay up”.

In 1974-’75 they had an awful regular season, but upset the heavily-favored LA Kings in the first-round of the playoffs.

Just when I thought, maybe…..they were swept in the next series in 4 straight.

In 1975-’76 the Leafs took the heavily-favored Flyers to 7 games, and led Game 7 right at the Spectrum in Philadelphia by a score of 2-1 in the second period. They got blown out.

Later that decade, they teased us when Lanny McDonald scored that memorable overtime Game 7 goal against the favored Islanders in ’78, without the injured Borje Salming.

Life looked good, until the powerful Montreal Canadiens swept them 4 straight in the next series, and did the same the next spring.

Then came the ‘80s. Nice nick-names like the ‘Kid Line’ (Boschman, Anderson, Saganiuk), the Hound Line (Courtnall, Leeman, Clark) emerged, as well as the drafting of the tough young winger on that Hound line, Wendell Clark. But they didn’t win a single playoff series in that entire decade, despite drafting world junior team goaltenders like Allan Bester and Ken Wreggett - and raising our hopes yet again.

The early ‘90s brought new hope with Pat Burns, Doug Gilmour and the now infamous game 6 against the Kings in LA. A missed Gretzky high-stick and the game- and eventually the chance to play Montreal for the Cup in the finals- was gone.

The next year, they won Game 1 of the semi-finals against Vancouver, but ran out of gas. We missed again.

Then came the arrival of superstar-in-waiting Mats Sundin. In Pat Quinn’s first year in 1998-’99 he led a remarkable turnaround after some terrible years. They made it to the semi-finals, but couldn’t beat Dominik Hasek’s back-up early in the series and never recovered.

A few years later, in 2002, the Leafs looked primed to walk past the Hurricanes and make it to the finals, but managed to lose the series at home in game 6- painfully, on a Mogilny give-away, in overtime.

The rest of this decade has seen close playoff losses to good Flyers teams, then a roster going backwards, missed playoffs since 2004, and a new man in charge promising, if not championships just yet, at least truculence.

Saturday night, the Leafs beat their nemesis this year, the Bruins, and showed a little of that promised grit. Gustavsson earned his first career shutout, and as I wrote earlier this season, it’s hard not to like a young goalie with his size, quickness and ability to inspire confidence in his teammates.

But Buffalo awaits tonight. The Sabres have been a pain since they joined the league in 1970-’71 and ex-Leaf coach Punch Imlach brought the Sabres to the old Gardens and hammered Toronto 7-2 in the first match-up between the two teams.

I don’t feel quite the same way I did when I posted before Saturday’s game (the time is right for a win, I wrote)—when I sensed the Leafs would beat the Bruins for the reasons I listed. Tonight is a bit of a different story.

Still, we’re getting to a point where we will see if this is a team, like many Leaf teams of the past 40 plus years, who can upset better teams on occasion, but can’t win when it really matters.

Games like the one tonight will help tell us if the current Leaf team, hard-working as they are, can really be more than a team which will on occasion win a game we may not expect them to win. They’ve defeated the Red Wings, the Capitals and now the Bruins. That’s all very nice. But what fans need to see is a run of games where they play well all over the ice from beginning to end, from the goal on out. They need to win several in a row—regardless of their opposition or whether they are at home or on the road.

Al Davis of the Oakland Raiders said it succinctly years ago: Just win, baby.

Boston’s visit to the ACC last night triggered memories of a long-ago family event that turned out well for a kid who loved hockey.

Those of you following some of the stories on this site may recall my anecdote about meeting Bobby Orr (“Bob” Orr, as he called himself that night) at Convocation Hall in Toronto in the fall of 1966. I was there as the youngest member of my family because my oldest brother, John, was receiving his Masters degree from the University of Toronto that night at fall convocation.

Well, it happens that I trekked back to Toronto with my family for John’s wedding a couple of months later. I believe it was early February of 1967, and while the wedding was a fairly small affair at a downtown Church, the reception was held in a couple of rooms at the relatively famous Royal York hotel, across from Union Station.

I was none too thrilled about any of this- the travel, the wedding or having to attend a boring reception for adults. As a 13 year-old, I was more interested in doing something interesting than sitting by myself and pretending I liked finger food, or getting kissed by grown-ups.

I remember walking into the hotel early that Saturday afternoon for the reception. I was glumly striding into the side entrance of the hotel with my brother-in-law, Peter.

On our way through the lobby, I thought I spotted a face I recognized.


“Hey, Peter, I think that’s Johnny Bucyk”.

“No, it can’t be” was Peter’s predictable adult response. Kids were usually wrong.

Now, Peter was a sharp guy, very laid back and not prone to over-reacting. He was a huge Leaf and overall hockey fan, however, and when he took the time to actually look at the guy I was talking about, standing in the lobby, he acknowledged that I was correct.

It was indeed Johnny Bucyk, the star winger of the (albeit then ‘lowly’) Bruins.

I had nothing with me that anyone could sign, so I quickly ran ahead of Peter to the elevators, waited impatiently for the doors to open, and went up to whatever floor the reception was being held. I barely said hello to anyone, not even congratulations to my brother and new sister-in-law Sue, and I was back down the elevator with a pen and a piece of paper—some Royal York stationary that I folded over.

It made sense to me to set up shop back down in the lobby where I first caught site of Bucyk. So I sat myself down in a comfortable Royal York lobby chair, and watched anxiously the comings and goings of strangers for the next couple of hours.

Looking for possible NHL player autographs was, to me, much better than a wedding reception.

My next player sighting was of Gilles Marotte, a broad, strong-jawed young man who I recognized as a  Bruin defenseman. He went scooting by and I jogged to catch up to him. I don’t recall any verbal exchange of note, but he was gracious enough to stop and sign my piece of paper in the hotel lobby on the night of a game (they were playing the Leafs that night at the Gardens).

Back to my chair. A little more waiting and next up was goaltender Eddie Johnston. I snagged his signature and was thrilled to do so. (I think my brother John actually went to school with Johnston’s brother at some point along the way, probably at a university in Eastern Canada, but that was irrelevant to me that day. I was hunting big game.)


What looked to be my last chance happened when Tommy Williams strode by. Williams’ claim to fame, beyond being a good offensive player for the Bruins, was that he was one of the first-ever American-born players to make it to the NHL, and at the time, he was the only one playing in the league. He signed just below Marotte and Johnston.

More time passed and I had pretty much given up hope of obtaining any more signatures, but I was thrilled to have had three guys sign my little piece of paper.

Just as I was about to head back to the elevator and the tedium of the reception, who came walking briskly by, with dry cleaning in his hand, but Bobby Orr.

Now, yes, I had “met” Orr some weeks prior, and had shook hands with him. But Orr wouldn’t have remembered me, of course.


That said, I sure knew who he was. This time, I literally had to run to catch up with him, and didn’t connect with him until I followed him into an elevator. I mumbled something nervously and stuck out my pen and paper. He shifted things around and signed the piece of paper.

The signature itself was a little on the “light” side (hey, he was holding his dry cleaning with one hand), but I knew it was the real deal.

Four Bruins in one sitting. Not bad.

It’s not like I travelled to Toronto often in those days. It just so happened my family had occasion to visit twice within the space of a few months.

I’ve been to weddings, including my own, of course, that had a special meaning, personally or spiritually. That said, I was a little young back then to fully appreciate what my brother was really doing.

But from a kid’s perspective, that wedding in the winter of 1967 turned out to be the best one I ever went to.

Saturday, December 19, 2009

Timing is right for a win

In the sports betting world, those who ‘tout’ their services like to speak of “locks”—that is, games they claim are a sure-fire win for a particular team.

I don’t know about “locks”, but I have to believe that the Leafs will have a big game tonight against the Bruins. Forget the “back-to-back” concerns. It’s a Saturday night at home. It’s Christmas season. But more importantly, after getting whacked twice in Boston recently and hammered last night in Buffalo, one can only imagine the team will mentally be ready to play hard. Kessel will be better than in the two games in Boston. He’ll be ready. Gustavsson will no doubt start in goal and will want to re-claim his spot as the guy in goal going forward.

It has to be the Leafs tonight.


There are many fine hockey web/blog sites worth following.

As someone who is more apt to read about the “old days”, one site I would recommend is Greatest Hockey Legends(http://www.greatesthockeylegends.com).
Beyond the fact that it is updated regularly by its host/writer Joe Pelletier, the photos alone are worth the visit. I learn something new every time I check it out. Some of the stories Pelletier has developed are about what we might consider obscure players, but the posts are always informative and often touching- besides providing information not widely discussed.

There are posts on current hockey issues, too, so the bases are really well covered.

I wrote a piece fairly recently for The Hockey Writers web site (http://thehockeywriters.com ) on “When the Montreal Canadiens dynasty came to an end”. For current hockey stuff, they have writers in every NHL market providing regular updates and insight. It’s a site I enjoy and follow as often as I can.

A Maple Leaf-oriented site with fabulous old photos is a site called Vintage Leafs (http://vintageleafs.blogspot.com )

The aptly named Pension Plan Puppets (http://www.pensionplanpuppets.com) site provides wall-to-wall Leaf coverage before and after games and is quite thorough. There are some fine writers and a nice dose of “old” stuff, which I appreciate and am partial to.

I’m sure there are others that readers can recommend, but these are just a few of the ones I am enjoying as I have become more involved in “blog space” in recent months.




In light of a couple of tough games for the Leafs this week, Vintage Leaf is making his list and checking it twice.

Before Christmas, we will post Vintage Leaf’s “wish list”—his checklist of Leaf players of Christmas pasts who would help the Leafs right now.

Every week we try to blend a little nostalgia, some old-time memories and hockey history sprinkled with thoughts on current Maple Leaf happenings.

I draw your attention to the most recent addition to our audio vault, our new interview with legendary hockey writer Red Fisher of the Montreal Gazette. Red shares his memories of the Leafs of yesteryear, including names like Frank Mahovlich, Dickie Duff, Bert Olmstead, Keon, Sittler, Gilmour, Ballard and Smythe. You’ll enjoy it. Click on the link.

Older fans may want to check out the post on The Original Twelve”, a retrospective on the massive change the NHL underwent when it doubled in size in one fell swoop in 1967. Another article featured our look at “12 Things Vintage Leaf preferred about pre-1967 expansion hockey”.

In a unique exercise, my recent post compiled a list which amounted to a 20-man “All-Star” team - a team comprised of the best non-Leaf players of the decade of the ‘60s.

We invite you to compile your own list of the best of the ‘60s and send it to us.

For current Leaf fans, the post “Ponikarovsky off the edge” touched on what the winger can bring to the team- some nights.

As always we appreciate your feedback.